top of page


Public·83 members

Homeopathic Medicine Book In Hindi Free Download UPDATED

So we personally created a PDF in Hindi and make it free to download just to spread the awareness of homeopathy in the name of master Hanemann. Download links of the book are given below this article Scroll down.

homeopathic medicine book in hindi free download

This book is just the manuscript of the main book. Comment some good words about it, if something is wrong then also comment below. We tried our best to make this book error-free but that there are some mistakes in the book, only your comments will make the more correct.

Hi Polly, thanks for your comment. If you and Lenny are looking to try some homeopathic treatment once more, you would be welcome to book a free intro call with me to discuss, and ask me any questions you may have. Here is my booking link: =19077393 Whatever you decide to do, I wish you and Lenny well. With my best wishes, Karen

Dear Terry, thank you for your comment and question. Homeopathy is an option for addressing the underlying causes of a chronic condition such as yours. If you are unfamiliar with our approach to asthma and chronic coughs, I have emailed you some further information about homeopathy. You are also welcome to book a free discovery call on zoom or by phone with me, to ask some further questions. With best wishes, Karen

Dr.Willmar Schwabe Arzneimittel, is considered one of the oldest and most venerated German homeopathic brand and leading manufacturer of natural medicines in the world. Schwabe is also the global leader in Phytomedicines (A new science that publishes innovative studies on safety, efficacy, quality and mechanisms of action of specified plant extracts, phyto-pharmaceuticals and their isolated constituents)

The Indian arm of this brand is called Dr. Willmar Schwabe India Pvt. Ltd., or simply Schwabe India or WSI . It was incorporated in 1994 and started production in 1997 to provide high quality of homeopathic medicines at affordable Indian cost. Its state-of-the-art manufacturing plant, located at Noida in Uttar Pradesh brings the 136 year old tradition of Schwabe excellence to India.

In this blog article we bring you the complete list of Willmar Schwabe homeopathic medicines listed by category with links to our official store where you can check out using convenient payment options

Homeopathy or homoeopathy is a pseudoscientific[1][2][3][4] system of alternative medicine. It was conceived in 1796 by the German physician Samuel Hahnemann. Its practitioners, called homeopaths, believe that a substance that causes symptoms of a disease in healthy people can cure similar symptoms in sick people; this doctrine is called similia similibus curentur, or "like cures like".[5] Homeopathic preparations are termed remedies and are made using homeopathic dilution. In this process, the selected substance is repeatedly diluted until the final product is chemically indistinguishable from the diluent. Often not even a single molecule of the original substance can be expected to remain in the product.[6] Between each dilution homeopaths may hit and/or shake the product, claiming this makes the diluent remember the original substance after its removal. Practitioners claim that such preparations, upon oral intake, can treat or cure disease.[7]

Hahnemann began to test what effects various substances may produce in humans, a procedure later called "homeopathic proving". These tests required subjects to test the effects of ingesting substances by recording all their symptoms as well as the ancillary conditions under which they appeared.[43] He published a collection of provings in 1805, and a second collection of 65 preparations appeared in his book, Materia Medica Pura (1810).[44]

Because medical practice of the time relied on treatments which were often ineffective and harmful, patients of homeopaths often had better outcomes than those being treated by medical practitioners.[58] Though ineffective, homeopathic preparations are rarely detrimental, thus users are less likely to be harmed by the treatment that is supposed to be helping them.[47] The relative success of homeopathy in the 19th century may have led to the abandonment of the ineffective and harmful treatments of bloodletting and purging and begun the move towards more effective, science-based medicine.[59] One reason for the growing popularity of homeopathy was its apparent success in treating people suffering from infectious disease epidemics.[60] During 19th-century epidemics of diseases such as cholera, death rates in homeopathic hospitals were often lower than in conventional hospitals, where the treatments used at the time were often harmful and did little or nothing to combat the diseases.[61]

The American non-profit Center for Inquiry (CFI) filed a lawsuit in 2018 against the CVS pharmacy for consumer fraud over its sale of homeopathic medicines.[78] It claimed that CVS was selling homeopathic products on an easier-to-obtain basis than standard medication.[79] In 2019, CFI brought a similar lawsuit against Walmart for "committing wide-scale consumer fraud and endangering the health of its customers through its sale and marketing of homeopathic medicines".[80][81] They also conducted a survey in which they found consumers felt ripped off when informed of the lack of evidence for the efficacy of homeopathic remedies, such as those sold by Walmart and CVS.[82][83]

In 2021, the French healthcare minister phased out social security reimbursements for homeopathic drugs.[30][31] France has long had a stronger belief in the virtues of homeopathic drugs than many other countries and the world's biggest manufacturer of alternative medicine drugs, Boiron, is located in that country.[84] Spain has also announced moves to ban homeopathy and other pseudotherapies.[32] In 2016, the University of Barcelona cancelled its master's degree in Homeopathy citing "lack of scientific basis", after advice from the Spanish Ministry of Health.[85] Shortly afterwards the University of Valencia announced the elimination of its Masters in Homeopathy.[86]

Provings are claimed to have been important in the development of the clinical trial, due to their early use of simple control groups, systematic and quantitative procedures, and some of the first application of statistics in medicine.[129] The lengthy records of self-experimentation by homeopaths have occasionally proven useful in the development of modern drugs: For example, evidence that nitroglycerin might be useful as a treatment for angina was discovered by looking through homeopathic provings, though homeopaths themselves never used it for that purpose at that time.[130] The first recorded provings were published by Hahnemann in his 1796 Essay on a New Principle.[131] His Fragmenta de Viribus (1805)[132] contained the results of 27 provings, and his 1810 Materia Medica Pura contained 65.[133] For James Tyler Kent's 1905 Lectures on Homoeopathic Materia Medica, 217 preparations underwent provings and newer substances are continually added to contemporary versions.[134][135]

Outside of the alternative medicine community, scientists have long considered homeopathy a sham[137] or a pseudoscience,[1][2][138][139] and the medical community regards it as quackery.[138] There is an overall absence of sound statistical evidence of therapeutic efficacy, which is consistent with the lack of any biologically plausible pharmacological agent or mechanism.[15] Proponents argue that homeopathic medicines must work by some, as yet undefined, biophysical mechanism.[92] No homeopathic preparation has been shown to be different from placebo.[15]

In 2009, the United Kingdom's House of Commons Science and Technology Committee concluded that there was no compelling evidence of effect other than placebo.[11] The Australian National Health and Medical Research Council completed a comprehensive review of the effectiveness of homeopathic preparations in 2015, in which it concluded that "there were no health conditions for which there was reliable evidence that homeopathy was effective."[162] The European Academies' Science Advisory Council (EASAC) published its official analysis in 2017 finding a lack of evidence that homeopathic products are effective, and raising concerns about quality control.[13] In contrast a 2011 book was published, purportedly financed by the Swiss government, that concluded that homeopathy was effective and cost efficient.[163] Although hailed by proponents as proof that homeopathy works,[164] it was found to be scientifically, logically and ethically flawed, with most authors having a conflict of interest.[164] The Swiss Federal Office of Public Health later released a statement saying the book was published without the consent of the Swiss government.[165]

Meta-analyses, essential tools to summarize evidence of therapeutic efficacy,[166] and systematic reviews have found that the methodological quality in the majority of randomized trials in homeopathy have shortcomings and that such trials were generally of lower quality than trials of conventional medicine.[167][168] A major issue has been publication bias, where positive results are more likely to be published in journals.[169][unreliable source?][170][171] This has been particularly marked in alternative medicine journals, where few of the published articles (just 5% during the year 2000) tend to report null results.[148] A systematic review of the available systematic reviews confirmed in 2002 that higher-quality trials tended to have less positive results, and found no convincing evidence that any homeopathic preparation exerts clinical effects different from placebo.[15] The same conclusion was also reached in 2005 in a meta-analysis published in The Lancet. A 2017 systematic review and meta-analysis found that the most reliable evidence did not support the effectiveness of non-individualized homeopathy.[172]

A 2000 review by homeopaths reported that homeopathic preparations are "unlikely to provoke severe adverse reactions".[203] In 2012, a systematic review evaluating evidence of homeopathy's possible adverse effects concluded that "homeopathy has the potential to harm patients and consumers in both direct and indirect ways".[204] A 2016 systematic review and meta-analysis found that, in homeopathic clinical trials, adverse effects were reported among the patients who received homeopathy about as often as they were reported among patients who received placebo or conventional medicine.[205]


Welcome to the group! You can connect with other members, ge...
bottom of page